UCF Faculty Resources

Analysis of an Argument
Sample analytical assignments...
 
Analyzing Ads

(contributed by Darren Crovitz)

Background
We are bombarded by different forms of argument every day; one of the most pervasive (widespread) forms of argument we encounter in our culture is advertising. America is not only a democracy, but a capitalistic and consumerist society, and advertising has been called the "rhetoric of democracy." Gaining an understanding of the purposes, strategies, and methods of this kind of argument will help us become better critical thinkers and more discerning citizens.
Assignment
Write a 1000-1500 word computer-drafted essay that carefully examines the explicit and implicit arguments of a print advertisement. You will choose your own text for analysis (with instructor approval).
Explicit Argument in an Ad
Explicit can mean "clearly seen, voiced, or explained" or "concrete." Almost all ads have the same basic explicit argument: "You should buy our product." Like all arguments, advertisements can use three kinds of appeals to their audience to support their basic position. Some will use logical appeal (claims, reasons, and evidence), others ethical appeal (coming across as fair-minded and truthful), and still others will rely on emotional appeal (colors, images, the connotations of words), or a combination of these three appeals. In your analysis, you should look for the specific kinds of appeals used in your advertisement.
Implicit Argument in an Ad
Implicit means "implied" or "not voiced, but intended." Implicit arguments are often assumptions (also known as warrants) made about people, relationships, culture, and ideas, that underlie all arguments. It is important to investigate these assumptions, in order to fully understand the motivations of an arguer. Ask yourself what assumptions are made in your advertisement, and why they are there: how do they reinforce the explicit argument?

The result of analyzing your ad should be an evaluation of two ideas:

  • Are the arguments in the advertisement credible?
  • Are the arguments in the advertisements effective?

Credible (credibility) means an argument is logically sound and well-supported with strong evidence.

Effective (effectiveness) means an argument works in convincing or persuading its audience. Many arguments that are effective are also credible…but there are also many that aren't.

Suggested Structure

  1. An introduction that presents the advertisement, the company, the product, and the target audience, and suggests a map and purpose for the essay
  2. An examination of explicit arguments made in the text
  3. An examination of implicit arguments made in the text
  4. A cohesive conclusion that evaluates credibility and effectiveness, and suggests the larger importance of your analysis

You must incorporate the following into your essay:

  • an appropriate academic tone
  • a well-rounded presentation of the ad's argument
  • a clear organization that guides the reader
  • specific examples and support
  • knowledge of argument techniques and logic
  • awareness of social issues and assumptions
 
Fight Club: Rasslin' with Arguments

(contributed by Darren Crovitz)

Background

Just about everything we encounter in life carries with it some commentary, perspective, or viewpoint about the world. A baseball hat with a marijuana leaf on the front, a Tommy Hilfiger shirt, a 500-year-old Catholic church, a student essay arguing for more parking garages at UCF, a can of Budweiser--all of these things make certain statements about culture, social values, quality, and what is real and important. All of these things make an argument for a particular point (or for many points). All of these things can be considered texts.

For example, let's use that can of Budweiser. It argues--through colors, insignia, the shape of the words, and the explicit message on the can--that it is the "King of Beers," and a quality beverage. It's making an argument, putting forth a position, hoping to convince people to buy that brand.
Is it an effective argument? Probably--many people seem to like that beer. But more importantly, we want to know if this argument is credible. These are two important terms you need to know when discussing arguments:

Credible (credibility) means an argument is logically sound and well-supported with strong evidence.

Effective (effectiveness) means an argument works in convincing or persuading its audience. Many arguments that are effective are also credible. But beware: there are also many effective arguments that lack credibility.

Back to the beer can. To figure out if it's credible, we'd need to analyze the argument it presents closely. Is it well-supported? Is there evidence (either specific or general) that support the claims it makes? Does the can present a fair view?
Obviously, a beer can can't go into too much detail in trying to prove its argument—there’s not enough space to make a complete explicit argument. So the beer can relies on implicit argument as well.

Explicit Argument: Explicit means "clearly seen, voiced, or explained" or "concrete." Verbal arguments are explicit, usually taking a form of an opinion, followed by reasons for this stance. Explicit arguments rely on different appeals to argue their points: logical appeal (claims, reasons, and evidence), ethical appeal (by treating the viewer or listener fairly and honestly), and emotional appeal (fear, pity, humor, compassion), or a combination of these three appeals.

Implicit Argument: Implicit means "implied" or "not voiced, but intended." Implicit arguments are often assumptions (also known as warrants) made about people, relationships, culture, and ideas, that underlie all arguments. It is important to investigate these assumptions, in order to fully understand the motivations of an arguer. Ask yourself what assumptions are made in a text, and why they are there: how do they reinforce the explicit argument?

The beer can uses an explicit argument to make its points, with elements of all three appeals. But it also implies many ideas as well, including what defines "good" beer, and quality. An analysis of the beer can would look at both explicit and implicit arguments, to determine effectiveness and credibility.
A beer can makes a single general argument. But other texts, like novels or films, can offer many different arguments within them. Some are very explicit, and others are implied, suggested only by images, mood, and tone.
Task:
Write a 1000-1500 word essay that carefully examines an explicit or implicit argument presented in a text: the 1999 film Fight Club. The film offers many opinions--some obvious, some implied. Choose one of these arguments as your focus for this assignment.

Your essay will be an analytical review of this argument. This means that in the essay, you should

  • Briefly describe the text
  • Explain the specific argument within the text that you will focus upon (where and how it appears)
  • Examine how well the argument is developed within the world of the text
  • Judge the overall effectiveness and credibility of the argument

Essentially, you will present a stance on how well the text develops a certain argument or position.

The result of your analysis should be an evaluation of two ideas:

  • Is the argument effective?
  • Is the argument credible?

Suggested Structure:

  1. An introduction that presents and briefly summarizes the text, and suggests a map and purpose for the essay
  2. An examination of a specific argument made in the text (what appeals are made and how well they are developed)
  3. A cohesive conclusion that evaluates effectiveness and credibility, and suggests the larger importance of your analysis
 
Myth and Movies

(contributed by Elise McKenna)

Background

Evidence of arguments can be found in the media, specifically films that are currently out in the cinemas. One of the most pervasive (widespread) forms of argument we encounter in our culture is found in films. America is currently dealing with the threat of terrorism and redefining the idea of freedom, but these are not new issues; simply look at any period in time and what the film industry has done to either focus or divert the viewer's attention in regards to social or political concerns. What is most interesting is the way in which we express ourselves implicitly. Films are an escape from reality, but they reflect real world concerns. Films that contain mythic elements invariably still reflect real world concerns. Gaining an understanding of the purposes, strategies, and methods of this kind of argument will help us become better critical thinkers and more discerning citizens. They may renew hope, focus on rehabilitation, or help to define the indefinable.

Assignment

Write a 1000-1500 word essay that carefully examines the explicit and implicit arguments of a film that has mythic or mystical elements. You will choose your own text for analysis (with instructor approval), but they must contain myth (no cartoon films allowed). By definition this means a traditional narrative usually involving supernatural or fancied persons, and embodying popular ideas on natural or social phenomena; such narratives are symbolic or allegorical. You must find and support your findings of the allegory in your chosen film.

 
 
 
Back to Writing Assignments Index

 


Sponsored by the University Writing Center (UWC)
MOD 608 (Behind Communications Building)
407.823.2197
uwc@mail.ucf.edu
Page Last Updated