OSC Ethics Seminar January 2003

OSC Ethics Seminar on Academic Integrity

March 12, 2003

Dr. Nancy Stanlick

Department of Philosophy

(most recent update: 03/10/03)

Ethical Issues in Academic Dishonesty

Syllabus for

March Meeting from 3:00-5:00 p.m. on 03/12/03 in BHC (Burnett Honors College) 126

This syllabus contains information on course requirements for the January 2003 meeting of the Office of Student Conduct/Department of Philosophy Academic Integrity Ethics Seminar. Please take note of the requirements and be prepared for the meeting of the seminar.

Description and Objective: This is a 2-hour overview of ethical issues involved in instances of academic dishonesty. It will begin with a discussion of the distinction between plagiarism and cheating and the ways in which plagiarism occurs (both intentionally and unintentionally) and how to avoid it. Specific topics to be explored may include lying, theft of intellectual property, self-deception and academic integrity. Others are different theories of ethics and how they are related to instances of academic dishonesty. The objective is to develop a sense of how particular issues relevant to academic dishonesty may be part of a larger social context in which it is often held that the end justifies the means, and why plagiarism and cheating are academic analogs to perjury, grand theft, forgery and lack of respect for self and others.

Requirements: You are responsible for attending, participating in discussion, and submitting a brief outline and critical essay. The outline and essay must, of course, be your original work. The outline and essay (listed below) are due 2 working days after the meeting of the seminar (due on March 14) by 5:00 p.m. in the Department of Philosophy office in CNH 411.

Discussions during the meeting.
Two required elements of the seminar. These are both due on MARCH 14 BY 5:00 P.M. Length, requirements, and submission information will be discussed during the meeting of the seminar.

Outline of a selected ethical theory, article, or other content. Mill’s Utilitarianism – see below in REQUIRED READINGS.
Essay on theoretical outlooks on academic integrity and honesty/dishonesty. See Gert’s book (listed below) and the powerpoint presentation link in REQUIRED READINGS.

Overview of Required Readings:

REQUIRED: Bernard Gert’s chapter on “Cheating” in the text, Morality: Its Nature and Justification. This text is available online through NetLibrary. Go to http://www.netlibrary.com. This service is available through the UCF Library. You must use on-campus servers, Pegasus, or connect with a proxy server as a UCF student to gain access to NetLibrary. Check the index and see esp. pp. 191-196. Also required is John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism, Chapters 2 and 3.

See also the PowerPoint presentation at http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~stanlick/cfccpresstu.ppt (this is the most recent version (March 2003) of theoretical aspects of cheating and plagiarism).

Another work may be added immediately prior to or during the course meeting.

Avoiding Plagiarism – Auxiliary Readings

Other Works and Sites Relevant to this Course:

a. UCFs Golden Rule Student Academic Behavior. Go to http://www.ucf.edu/goldenrule/studaca.html

b. Plagiarism: How to Recognize it and How to Avoid it. Go to http://www.indiana.edu/~wts/wts/plagiarism.html

c. Buying Papers on the Internet??? Not a good idea. Go to http://www.schoolsucks.com and http://www.turnitin.com

d. A simple statement of academic integrity. Go to http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~stanlick/acinteg.html

Consider these Questions:

What is your reaction to the claim that if you cheat, you are only cheating yourself? How about this? When you cheat, you are cheating other students.
If you buy a term paper over the Internet (or find one in a file cabinet, or borrow an old one from a friend), are you plagiarizing when you understand the material and re-write the paper in your own words?
Which of these views of the justification of plagiarism or cheating most closely resembles your own? If none of these are related to your reasons, what was your reason?

What matters most is good grades. That's one of the major factors in entrance to law school (medical, graduate, etc.).
If I don't get good grades, my parents will cut off my funds.
The subject matter of the course is too difficult for me, and I need the course to graduate.
This class doesn't have anything to do with my major, so it doesn't matter if I cheat or plagiarize. What's the point in knowing English literature when I want to get a job in technical writing (or whatever)?
I had to study for a test (or tests) in another class and didn't have time for this one.
I won't get caught, and it's easier to cheat on a test or buy/borrow/steal a paper than it is to put in hours and hours of studying/writing. Anyway, I have more important things to do.

Additional Note: If you have any questions regarding this 2-hour seminar or its requirements, please contact me by e-mail at stanlick@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu . You may also stop by during my office hours for this term. They are listed on my website at http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~stanlick/ .