KANTIAN ETHICAL
THEORY
Rules
of morality must be laws, and laws, which are derived from reason, must
apply universally. They are therefore without exception.
Actions
are the result, not the determining factor, of morality. The action
is the result, not the requirement, of morality.
Some of Kant's favorite
moral examples:
The
Lying Promise. Why is it morally wrong to make a promise and not
intend to keep it?
Suicide.
Why is suicide morally wrong?
Developing
Talents. Why is it morally wrong to leave your abilities unused?
Being
Kind. Why is it morally wrong to be nasty?
Defining features of
Kant's moral theory:
-
Human beings have dignity;
moral worth
-
Morality can be summed up
in one principle, the Categorical Imperative
-
Why the categorical imperative
is different from, and superior to, a hypothetical imperative. A
moral system built on a system of hypothetical imperatives might warrant
approval, but it cannot warrant respect.
-
The C.I. is a) universal,
and b) the embodiment of morality in terms of duty, not consequences.
-
2 (of 3) formulations of
the C.I. = universality and respect for persons/means-ends
The good will is the only
thing good without qualification.
Why
wealth, health, a good sense of humor are not good without qualification
Duty=the necessity of
an action done out of respect for the moral law.
Why reason should be,
and is, the ruler of the will:
All
natural endowments have a particular function or purpose
Inclination and emotion are unacceptable as rulers of the will
It is not enough that
an action be done:
-
Can be done by accident,
so intent is necessary
-
Intent is not enough.
There must be a principle
-
But not just any principle
is good enough. It must be a universally binding principle.
-
The principle must be the
categorical imperative, because it is universally binding.
Comments:
Universalizing
absurd moral rules
If
X is universalizable, then X is right