|
PHI 3670, Ethical Theory, Spring 2001 MWF 2:00-2:50 in CL1-105 University of Central Florida |
Dr. Nancy Stanlick/ E-mail: stanlick@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu Office: HFA
411-I/Hours MWF 9:30-10:45, M 4:00-4:30 and by appt. Phone 407-823-5459; Dept. 407-823-2273 |
On-Line Syllabus
It is not required that you use this on-line syllabus, but
it is strongly suggested that you do.
Announcements, links, review questions and other information relevant to
this course will appear here. If
you need copies of review questions or this syllabus, computer labs may be used
or you can use your own computer and printer.
Details will be added to the schedule throughout the
semester.
|
Paper dates changed…. |
General Course
Description and Objective: PHI
3670 is a course in ethical theory, encompassing major ethical theories from
virtue theory in ancient Greece to contemporary approaches to ethics. In addition, some major
practical/theoretical issues will be explored through the backdrop of primary
theories of ethics. Among the
theories to be discussed are the virtue theoretical approaches to ethics from
Plato and Aristotle, the deontological ethical theory of Immanuel Kant,
classical and contemporary utilitarianism, feminist ethics, and contemporary
virtue theory. Among the practical
issues are the ethical significance of emotion, self-control and courage,
supererogation and welfare, animals and the environment, self-respect,
friendship, and moral responsibility.
You will be able to identify and discuss in some detail major ethical
theories and apply them to problems and concepts of a practical and theoretical
nature.
Texts: Denise, Peterfreund and White, Great
Traditions in Ethics (abbrev. GTIE), 9th ed. Wadsworth and Mike Martin, Everyday
Morality (abbrev. EM), 3rd ed. Wadsworth. There are additional materials on reserve or available
on-line through electronic research sources. These are listed in the schedule below.
Course Requirements, Grades, Attendance Policy, and Related
Issues:
Requirements: Two examinations and a term paper (see the link at
the end of this paragraph for information on paper options and requirements)
are required and determine your grade for the course. Examinations will be primarily essay-based, though there may
be questions in “objective” format.
Examination dates will be announced in class and are listed in the
schedule (below). Examinations are
based on readings, lectures and assignments completed or assigned prior to the
date of their administration. All
examinations are sectional. The final examination is NOT cumulative. Exams and the paper count equally in
determining your final grade. View Paper Requirements, due date,
etc.
Grades and Grading Scale: A, 90-100; B, 80-89; C, 70-79; D, 60-69. Grades are not negotiable. See the link to academic integrity. There is NO EXTRA CREDIT offered or available in this
course.
Attendance Policy: Attendance is strongly encouraged and
expected but it is not considered in determining your grade for the
course. You do not get “credit”
for showing up for class – being in class is (one would think) a given. Much of the material covered in class
may not appear in the texts, readings, or articles. Though I will not take attendance on a regular basis (or at
all), your participation in class and your attentive presence can and will make
a very significant difference in your appreciation of the issues, problems,
theories and subject matter we will discuss – and in your grade. If you miss a class, you are
responsible for obtaining notes and any other information or assignments you
missed. Office hours are held to
attend to academic matters relevant to this course. They are not held to repeat a lecture already given in
class.
Missed
Examinations/Late or Missing Papers and other requirements: If you are not present on a day on
which the first examination is administered and if you have missed the
examination for a good,
legitimate and verifiable reason, you may make it up within three (3)
class meeting days of its initial administration. Be aware that a test taken late may be different from the
one given on the original test day.
After three class meeting days have passed, you may not take the test
and must forfeit the grade (receive a 0 for it). If you miss the mid-term examination without a good, legitimate and verifiable
reason, your only option is to receive a 0 for it. Good, legitimate and verifiable reasons include illnesses
and religious holidays. There is NO PROVISION FOR MAKING UP THE FINAL
EXAMINATION. So, don’t miss
it. Incomplete grades are given
only under appropriate circumstances.
The
due date for term papers is listed in the schedule below (March
21 for paper 1 and April 20 for paper 2). One letter grade (10 points) will be subtracted from your
earned grade for every weekday the paper is late. No paper will be accepted after three
working days beyond the due date.
So turn it in on time.
Remember to submit the form distributed with the short version of the
syllabus by 1/19/2001. Failure to
submit this form will reduce your final average by 3 points.
Note: The
schedule below is meant only as a guide.
Changes and alterations in the schedule, scheduled topics, or
examination dates may be necessary to facilitate completion of all major
sections listed below. Also note
that additional material may be added from time to time, either through lectures,
Internet sources (such as additions and links within this syllabus), journal
articles, or any other appropriate sources. If they are to be added, they will be announced in class or
noted in this syllabus as needed.
Note: Review questions may be added from time
to time. Watch the table below for
additions. Review questions are
designed for review of major concepts presented throughout the course and do
not necessarily reflect actual content, format, number, or sort of questions
that will appear on examinations.
The
message board
link was created for use in this and other courses as an on-line forum
for discussion of review questions and concepts between and among people
registered for this and other courses.
I occasionally check the message board and perform maintenance on it,
but do not necessarily contribute to your on-line discussions. When you use the
board, please use your real name and put your e-mail address in the appropriate
field. Anonymous postings or notes
posted with the use of an alias should not be used on the board and will be
deleted by its administrator.
Please do not use any person’s name but your own when you post messages,
answers to review questions, questions of your own, or any comments. It is a good idea to make it clear in
the subject field the course for which you are posting a message since there
will be around 400 people from 4 different courses using the message board.
Schedule:
|
Weeks |
Dates |
Topic |
Martin, EM |
Denise et. al.
GTIE |
Additional
Readings and lecture notes links |
Other
Information, links, etc. |
|
1 - 8 |
Jan 8 – March 2 |
Egoism, Subjectivism and Emotivism This section (egoism, subjectivism, emotivism) will be completed on 1/31/01. |
#1 4-20 |
#2 Hobbes 103-119 #3 Hume 134-148 #4 Butler 120-133 #5 A.J. Ayer & C.L. Stevenson 288-304 |
#6 Ayn Rand – notes
on her arguments and others for ethical egoism; critique --Basic
Background on Ethical Theories --Basic Notes on
Hobbes – edited 1/21/2001 ~Hume |
Remember that this syllabus is constantly
evolving – links and additional information are added regularly. |
|
|
|
Utility, Rights, Duty and Pragmatism – Utilitarianism This section (Utilitarianism) begins on 2/2/01. |
#1 21-42 |
#2 Mill 166-182 #3 Sidgwick, 217-229 #4 Moore, 263-275 |
#5 J.J.C. Smart, “Extreme and Restricted
Utilitarianism,” Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 6. No. 25 (Oct. 1956),
pp. 344-354. JSTOR Paper/Notes on Act and
Rule Utilitarianism #6 John Searle, “How to Derive an Ought
from an Is” in Phillipa Foot, Theories of Ethics, BJ21.F6 1967. |
Notes on Mill and
Kant – basic, from Intro course No notes are posted on Smart, Searle, Moore – in class only. Copies distributed in class - Searle. |
|
|
|
Rights-Based Morality and The Ethics of
Duty |
|
#3 Kant, 149-165 #4 W.D. Ross, 276-287 #5 William Frankena, 375-end #6 John Rawls, 331-344. |
#1 Locke, from Second Treatise of
Government, esp. chs. 1,2,3,4, and 5 (See http://books.mirror.org). #2 J.L. Mackie, “Can There Be a
Right-Based Morality?” in Studies in Ethical Theory, (Midwest Studies in
Philosophy, Vol. 3), ed. French, Uehling and Wettstein, Univ of Minnesota
Pr., 1978 (BJ1012.s86 1980) and reprinted in J. Waldron, Theories of
Rights, (JC 571.T44 1984) (NY: Oxford UP, 1984), pp. 168-181. |
Rights-Based
Morality – notes on Mackie and Raz Basic Background
on Locke – on-line notes. Kant and Mill
notes again, from intro course. Kant begins 2/19/01. Copies – Mackie & Raz distributed in
class. If you didn’t get one,
come by during my office hours to pick one up. No on-line notes for Ross, Frankena or Rawls. |
|
|
|
Pragmatism |
|
#1 John Dewey, 247-262 |
Essays by William
James have been deleted from schedule. |
|
|
|
|
Virtue Theory |
#1 43-61 |
#2 Plato, 6-22 #3 Aristotle, 23-39 #4 Epicurus 40-53 |
Mid-term
exam – contents: Rand, Hobbes, Hume, Butler, Emotivism, Smart, Searle, Mill, Moore,
Kant, Ross, Rawls, Locke, Mackie, Raz, Dewey, Plato, Aristotle Link to Review
Questions – posted on 3/1. The Feminist Ethics
Mid-term is on-line and three of your review questions are identical to
theirs. You may want to see it
to see the sorts of questions you could have on your test. In fact, they might be downright
useful. Remember, however, that
yours is an in-class exam and the questions may not be quite so detailed. |
Midterm Exam
March 9 – review questions will be posted on-line
or distributed in class. |
|
Mar
19-Apr. 23 |
|
SYLLABUS CLARIFICATIONS FOR SPRING BREAK TO END
OF TERM APPEAR BELOW IN BLUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continue Virtue Theory |
|
#1 Epicurus, 40-53 and Epictetus, 54-68 #2 Aquinas, 87-102 #5 Phillipa Foot, 345-357 |
#3 G.E.M. Anscombe, “Modern Moral Philosophy,” Philosophy,
Vol. 33 (January 1958), pp. 1-15.
JSTOR. #4 Michael Stocker, “The Schizophrenia of
Modern Ethical Theories” in Journal of Philosophy 73, 14 (August 12,
1976): 453-66. JSTOR |
Paper 1 is due on March 21. |
|
|
|
Relativism, Conventionalism, Pluralism and
Multiculturalism |
#1 62-80 |
#3 Nietzsche 230-246 #4 Sartre 305-316 #5 Kurt Baier 317-330 |
#2 In-class discussion of ethical relativism –
article by Rachels omitted. |
|
|
|
|
Religious Ethics |
#1 81-92 |
#3 Kierkegaard 183-199 |
#2 Plato, Euthyphro (go to http://books.mirror.org) |
|
|
|
|
Feminist Ethics |
#4 93-109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continue Feminist Ethics |
|
#1 Annette Baier, 358-374 |
#2 Virginia Held, “Feminist Transformations of
Moral Theory,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 50,
Supplement (Autumn, 1990), pp. 321-344.
JSTOR #3 Annette Baier, “What Do Women Want in a
Moral Theory?” Nous, Vol.
19, No. 1, 1985 APA Western Div. Meetings (Mar, 1985), pp. 53-65. JSTOR |
|
|
|
|
Race & Ethnic Identity |
#1 110-124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morality and the Emotions |
#1 249-261 |
|
#2 Leslie Farber, “The Faces of Envy,” in
Kruschwitz and Roberts, The Virtues (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1987), pp. 164-170. ON RESERVE OR IN CLASS. #3 Lawrence Blum, “Compassion,” from Explaining
Emotions, ed. Amelie O. Rorty, (Berkeley: Univ. California Pr., 1980), 507-518. ON RESERVE OR IN CLASS. Also in Kruschwitz and Roberts, pp.
229-236 #4 TBA |
|
|
|
|
Self Control and Courage |
#1 294-307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Ethics of Friendship |
#1 237-248 |
|
#2 Aristotle – Bks. VIII and IX of Nicomachean
Ethics – see http://books.mirror.org #3 R.W. Emerson – source TBA – on reserve or in
class. #4 Michel Montaigne –source TBA – on reserve or
in class. |
|
|
|
|
Supererogation and Welfare Ethics |
#1 380-392 |
|
#2 Susan Wolf, “Moral Saints,” The Journal of
Philosophy, 79, 8 (August 1982), 419-39. JSTOR #3 Others on Supererogation – TBA – Urmson and
Susan Hale – on reserve or in class. |
|
|
|
|
Self Respect and Human Value |
#1 264-279 |
|
#2 R.W. Emerson, “Self-Reliance” – go to http://books.mirror.org. #3 Thomas E. Hill, Jr., “Servility and
Self-Respect,” The Monist, Vol. 57, No. 1 (January 1973), pp. 87-104. #4 Jean Hampton, “The Wisdom of the Egoist,” in
Self-Respect, ….. – on reserve or in-class. |
|
|
|
Apr 9-13 |
Abortion and Human Value |
#1 126-140 |
|
#2 Judith Jarvis Thomson, “In Defense of
Abortion,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, no. 1 (1971), 47-66. JSTOR. #3 Don Marquis, “Why Abortion is Immoral,” in
Jour. Phil. – online. #4 Walter Sinnot-Armstrong – “You Can’t Lose
What you Ain’t Never Had: A
Reply to Marquis on Abortion – on-line. |
|
|
|
|
Euthanasia and Human Value |
#1 336-348 |
|
James Rachels on Active and Passive Euthanasia
– on reserve or in-class. |
|
|
|
|
Moral Responsibility |
#1 310-323 |
|
#2 Virginia Held, “Can a Random Collection of
Individuals be Morally Responsible?”
The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 67, No. 14 (Jul 23, 1970), pp.
471-481. JSTOR. #3 Sartre from Being and Nothingness and
Aristotle from Nic. Ethics – on reserve or in class. |
Paper 2 is due April 20 |
|
|
|
Animals and the Environment |
#1 141-152, 153-168 |
|
#2 Carol Adams, “Bringing Peace Home: A Feminist Philosophical Perspective on
the Abuse of Women, Children and Animals, HYPATIA, pp. 63-84, vol. 9, no. 2,
spr. 1994. |
|
|
|
Apr 23 Last Day of Classes |
Review for Final Exam, Closing Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final Exam |
|
|
|
|
Friday 4/27 from 1:00-3:50 |
Remember to turn in the form (distributed with the short
version of the syllabus) by 1/19/2001.
It is a course
requirement.