PHI 2101: Review for
Exam 3
The format of this review reflects or mirrors the format of
the actual test on April 24. Questions
and problems will, of course, be different.
- Represent
symbolically the valid argument form disjunctive syllogism using SYMBOLS
ONLY.
- Represent
symbolically the invalid argument “Affirming the Consequent.”
- Using
a truth table, determine whether these two statements are equivalent to
each other. (Remember to put the «
symbol between the two and show the answer under that symbol as the “major
connective.”
(~B à A) (A v B)
- Use
DeMorgan’s theorem on the following:
- ~(A
v ~B) _____________________
- ~(C ·
D) _____________________
- Symbolize
the following statements using the capitalized letters.
- If
either A or B, then both C and D. ____________________
- Neither
C nor not D. ____________________
- If
A, then not B. ____________________
- If you
know that “if Ann graduates, she will get a job” is true, then what do you
know about the following? That is,
indicate for each of the statements below whether it must be true, cannot be
true, or that it may be true.
- Ann
will get a job. ____________________
- If
Ann does not get a job, then she did not graduate. ________________
- Either
Ann did not graduate or she will get a job. _______________
- If
Ann does not graduate, she will not get a job. ________________
- If you
know that “it is not the case that either John or Kevin will graduate,”
what do you know about the following?
Indicate for each of the statements below whether it must be true, cannot be true, or that it may be true.
- John
will not graduate.
_______________
- If
John graduates, then Kevin will not graduate. ________________
- It
is not the case that if John does not graduate, Kevin will graduate. __________
- John
will not graduate or Kevin will not graduate. ________________
- Define
the term “necessary condition.”
- What
is the ultimate principle of morality of Utilitarianism? What does this principle mean? Explain briefly.
- From a
Utilitarian point of view, would you be able to justify the claim that
recognition of civil rights for all Americans is justified? That is, what argument can you put
forth using Kant’s ethical theory that would show this to be the
case? (Make the argument simple
and straightforward.)
- What
is Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave”?
What is it meant to symbolize or explain?
- Create
a simple mind map to illustrate and clarify either the concept of
“justice” or “equality.”