1.  What is negative freedom?
2.  What does itmean to say that negative freedom reduces the function of the state to a "night watchman or traffic policeman"?
3.  Berlin claims that Mill confuses two distinct notions - what are they?  (Coercion frustrates desires and is bad; non-interference is good.)  Why is freedom in the negative sense not logically connected with democracy or self-government?
4.  What is positive freedom?
5.  How does Berlin distinguish between the notions of a supposed "real" self and an "empirical" self and what does it have to do with positive freedom?