PHH 3700 – American Philosophy – Review for Final Exam on
4/18/02
Your final exam on 4/18/02 will be composed of 9
short-medium essay questions that will be based on the questions below (5
questions will be short answer/identification/definitional, 4 others will be
longer essays). Test questions may be
identical in format to, or be presented in part, combined, or derived from, the
questions below. You do not need a blue
book for this exam. COMPUTERS WILL BE
OFF DURING THE EXAM. Academic honesty
and integrity are expected and required.
- What
is Thomas Paine’s distinction between government and society? Do you agree with what he says
regarding this distinction?
Why? Briefly defend your
answer.
- What
does Paine mean by the claim that society exists to satisfy our wants, but
government exists as a result of our wickedness?
- What
is Paine’s distinction between natural rights and civil rights?
- How
does Paine justify the claim that government does not exist by a contract
between the people and government, but is instead the product of a
constitution, which is antecedent to government?
- What
is the meaning of Emerson’s claim that the state or government must
follow, not lead, its citizens?
How is this position relevant to the notion that less government is
better than more?
- In
your considered view, are the views of Emerson and Thoreau regarding the
function or necessity of government the same? Explain.
- Against
what was Thoreau protesting when he refused to pay his taxes? Why did he claim to be more free in
prison than others were outside of it?
Was Thoreau an anarchist?
Defend your claim.
- What
is Sarah Grimke’s argument against the claim that men are morally superior
to women? Even if man were woman’s
moral superior, what is her argument against continuing to subjugate
women? What claims of Elizabeth
Cady Stanton are similar to, or justify, Grimke’s position?
- In
your considered view, what is Sojourner Truth’s message regarding the
notion of the “special status” of a woman in her speech, “Ain’t I a
Woman?” Justify your claim.
- In
“Solitude of Self,” what is the meaning of the term “self-sovereignty,”
especially as it relates to moral responsibility and the development of
individual human character?
Explain, in your view, the way in which “Solitude of Self” has
affinities to Emersonian “Self-Reliance”.
What is the solitude of self?
- What
was Angelina Grimke’s reply to those who said that they could not fight
against slavery because of the personal costs that it would incur? How does she show that slavery is
contrary to the Declaration of Independence, that it is contrary to the
law of God, and that it reduces a human being to a thing?
- What
was Garrison’s argument in “Declaration of Sentiments of the American
Anti-Slavery Society” that the grievances of America’s founders were
trifling compared to the hardships of slaves?
- In
Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience,” in Grimke’s “Appeal to the Christian Women
of the South,” and in “The Declaration of Sentiments of the American
Anti-Slavery Society,” there is a clear development of the notion that it
is NOT unjust to break an unjust law.
This notion is also found very clearly in the “Letter from the
Birmingham Jail.” Explain in your
own words the ways in which this form of “civil disobedience” is at once moral,
legal, and obligatory in all four of these works.
- Why
does Frederick Douglass hold the position that there is no need to ARGUE
for the notion that every human being has a right to property in his own
body? Why does he claim that there
is no need to ARGUE that slaves ought to be free? What, in your considered view, is the
status of the “ironies” of American belief in the meaning and value of the
4th of July while at the same time allowing for the enslavement
of other human beings?
- In your
view, is the position of Martin Luther King, Jr. or Malcolm X more
powerful in making positive changes in the civil rights movement? What, in your view, are the two most
significant ways in which King’s position is similar to that of Thoreau
regarding the necessity for civil disobedience? How does King respond to
his critics who claim that his actions precipitate violence? Explain.
- Given
William James’s statement that there will be no final truth in ethics
until the last human being has lived his life and had his say, do you
think that James’s conception of pragmatism is tantamount to moral/ethical
relativism? How about his claim in
“What Makes a Life Significant” that “ideals” are relative to the
individual? Explain.
- Briefly
describe William James’s conception of the notion of what it is that makes
a life significant. What does he
mean by the notion that ideals by themselves give no reality and virtues
by themselves give no novelty? Do you agree with him? Why?
Defend your answer.
- What
is John Dewey’s “scientific” conception of morality? That is, how does his view incorporate
the ideals of scientific method in ethics? Do you agree with Dewey that the traditional notion of a
fixed truth in ethics is both impractical and unreasonable? Explain why you think (or don’t think)
that Dewey is right that his view of ethics would do away with intolerance
and fanaticism.
- John
Rawls presents two principles of justice, and one is prior to the
other. What are they? Why is one prior to the other? How are
they formulated? In your view, are
his proposals conducive to “fairness”?
Why?
- Robert
Nozick argues that “liberty upsets patterns” and he argues for an
“entitlement theory.” How does the
example of the basketball player serve to show that the first is the case,
and what does the second concept mean?
- Annette
Baier and Virginia Held argue that traditional ethico-political concepts
do not include the experience of women, and thus traditional moral and
political theories are flawed. In
what way do they attempt to show that this is the case? Which of their arguments do you find
most convincing? Why? Defend your claim.