Nature
of Crime CCJ 5015
Dr.
Robert E. Ford
Conflict Theory
Conflict
theories begin with the assumption that society is not held together by agreement and
consensus on major values.
Conflict Theories
Groups are held together in a dynamic investigations of opposing
group interests and efforts.
A dynamically maintained equilibrium with a continuous
possibility of shifting positions of gaining or losing status, with the need to maintain
an alert defense.
Conflict is as a principal and essential social process upon
which society depends.
Conflict Theory
Power
is the principal determinant of the outcome of conflict.
Most
powerful groups control the law.
Less
powerful groups continue to act in accordance with their norms, violating the law.
Law as a Type of Social Control
Social control consists of a normative system with rules about
the way people should and should not behave.
It has a system of formal and informal mechanisms used to control
deviation from and promote conformity to these rules.
Informal control consists of family, friendship groups, churches,
neighborhoods, and other community groups.
Law as a Type of Social Control
Formal
social control includes law and the criminal justice system in which the rules are
promulgated and enforced by agents of social control.
Informal
and formal social control are often seen as inversely related. (Black, 1976)
Social
control relies in large measure on socialization.
Law and Social Control
Law differs from other mechanisms of social control
in that it relies primarily on the external application of formal negative sanctions for
punishment of wrongdoing
These
sanctions are supported by the legitimatised and authoritative coercion of the state.
Law and Social Control
Two
major perspectives on the enactment and enforcement of the law:
The
law develops out of a widespread normative consensus in society.
The
law develops out of conflict between groups and the exercise of power.
The
law endorses and protects the narrow interests of those groups that wield power.
Law and Social Control
Until
the 1960s the major approach to law was the consensus model.
Under
consensus the law incorporated those norms where there is the greatest consensus
Durkhiem
(mechanical v. organic solidarity)
Mechanical
much more brutish and strict
Organic
more toward restitution, civil and constitutional law.
Law and Social Control
Weber
proposed that as the economies became more rational that the law would become more
rational.
Rationality
in the law is based on adherence to rule of law (due process) and fair procedures
determined by legal principles.
Sumner
(1906) formal codification of the prevailing folkways and mores.
Law and Social Conflict
In
the late 1950s conflict theory began to challenge the consensus model. (Vold, 1958;
Dahrendorf, 1959; Vold & Bernard, 1986)
In
the 1960s, several criminologists reformulated conflict theory (Quinney, 1970;Chambliss,
1969; Turk, 1969)
Law and Social Control
The
law on the books and the law in action often favors the interests of special groups.
Conflict
theory sees society as in a more or less continuous state of conflict.
Criminal
definitions describe behavior that conflicts with the interest of groups that have the
power to shape public policy. (Quinney, 1970)
Law and Social Control
Class,
sex, age, ethnicity, and other characteristics that denote social position determine who
gets apprehended and punished.
Law
is both the result of and a weapon to be used in class conflict. (Turk,1977)
Pluralism
(debated) recognizes several power centers
Pluralistic Models of Conflict
McGarrell and Castellano (1991) three levels of factors that come
into play:
Highest level, social-structural conflicts generated by
heterogeneity and inequality and symbolic conflicts
Mid level, rates of victimization, fear of crime and public fears
of victimization
Third level, media reports, interest group activities, reform
campaigns, and political events.
Pluralistic Model of Conflict
Description:
a decentralized, loosely coupled system, into which multiple elites and competing groups, interject their influence,
but which responds to institutional, economic and political changes.
Competing
interest groups attempt to uphold their values through legislatures.
Pluralistic Model of Conflict
Influence
is not only directed to law but also to the appointment of judges and other key law
enforcement personnel.
Interested
threatened or supported by law may be symbolic as well as material.
The
core of the criminal law has substantial agreement among all members of society (mala in
se)
Pluralistic Model of Law
The
core areas may have originally been developed to support particular interests.
The
media proves to be a powerful player in shaping public opinion which in turn shapes
policy.
This
conflict model was incorporated into labeling theory.
Research on Genesis of Law
Three
types of research that evaluate conflict theory.
Studies of the
influence of interest groups on legislation, administrative rule making and court
decisions.
Research on the
consensus or dissensus in public opinion
Research into the
exercise of discretion and factors influencing use of discretion.
Interest Groups and Legislation
These studies have identified specific groups involved in
influencing the enactment of law:
Well organized pressure groups
More diffuse regional, labor, business, farms, religious and
others.
Law enforcement and government agencies
These studies support more a pluralistic model as opposed to
either pure conflict or consensus.
Consensus or Dissensus
Public opinion about what acts and how much acts are disapproved
If the laws resonate with approval or if there is sufficient
dissensus it should suggest consensus or dissensus.
Studies show that there is broad agreement that cuts across class
and most other characteristics.
Mala in se most widely held, mala prohibita increasing dissensus
Supports pluralistic model.
Extra-legal Variables and the Exercise of Discretion.
Conflict theory posits that use of discretion will be biased
against less powerful.
The research suggests that criminal justice decisions are more
likely to be based on legally relevant, neutral and non biased factors more than on extra
legal group related factors.
It is clear that those the least powerful make up the bulk of
those punished????
Extra-legal Factors and Criminal Justice
Blacks and the poor are over-represented in the justice system.
Males are over-represented.
This conflicts with the theory.
Black males and Indians more likely to receive lenient treatment
than white youth in the Juvenile Justice System (Lieber, 1994).
Social Characteristics or behavior?
Extra-Legal Factors and the Justice System.
When
legal variables ( seriousness, prior record, aggravating circumstances) are controlled
differences in arrests, court outcomes, and
sentence severity disappear for race, class, sex, age and ethnicity.(Wilbanks,1987)
More
serious the offense more likely to be neutral on extra legal variables.
Extra-legal Factors in Use of Discretion
How can there be such disparities in the end product when the
system is not taking into account extra system variables.
Small uncounted discrepancies build up through the system to
result in the disparities, or,
The underlying behavior is different.
Extra legal factors do not support a pure conflict model.
Conflict Theories of Criminal Behavior
Criminal behavior is a reflection of the conflict inherent in
society.
Conflict theory sees crime as the ordinary learned and normal behavior of people brought up in
cultural and group conflict.
A set of crimes known as political crimes would be a direct
manifestation of this theoretical perspective.
Only political crime appears to fit the conflict model.
Postmodern School
Conflict theory is like postmodernism. There are different classes involved in power
struggle. The dominant are those in power, in legislative and enforcer positions. The laws are written and enforced from their
perspective. Truth" depends of how much power you wield.
Society no longer reflects class struggle. Race issues have been likened to class issues;
gender issues to class issues. Elements of class can be seen in both, but there is
intersectionality forcing theorist to redefine class. Many who adopt this position are
Post-Marxists.
Bibliography
Black,
Donald J. (1976) The Behavior of Law. New York, Academic Press
Chambliss,
William J. ed. Crime and the Legal Process. New York, McGraw Hill.
Lieber,
Michael L. (1994) A comparison of juvenile court outcomes for Native Americans,
African Americans, and Whites. Justice Quarterly, 11:257-279.
Bibliography
McGarrell,
Edmund F. & Thomas C. Castellano (1991) The politics of law and order, case
study evidence for the conflict model of the criminal law formulation process. Journal
of Research in Crime and Delinquency.28: 304-329.
Quinney,
Richard (1970) The Social Reality of Crime Boston: Little Brown.
Bibliography
Sumner,
William Graham (1906) Folkways Boston: Ginn.
Turk,
Austin T.(1969) Criminology and the Legal
Order. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
Turk,
Austin T. (1977) Class, conflict, and criminalization, Socialogical Focus
10: 209-220.
Bibliography
Vold, George B. (1958) Theoretical Criminology. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Vold, George B. & Thomas J. Bernard (1986) Theoretical
Criminology. Third edition, New York: Oxford University Press
Wilbanks, William (1987) The Myth of a Racist Criminal Justice
System. Monterey CA: Brooks/Cole.