
|
Tax research is the process of locating and interpreting the answers to tax questions. It is important to understand that the answers are obtained from authoritative sources, and to understand that judgment often is essential to research. Authoritative sources may be grouped based on the branch of the government that generates the rules. |
| Legislative
Constitution http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~bandy/constitution.htm ![]() ![]() Committee Reports Congressional Record Treaties Administrative
Judicial
![]() |
|
|
Below are alternative formats used to cite
the Internal Revenue Code.
|
| The Internal Revenue Code is organized
as follows:
26 Title--Internal Revenue Code
2 Section--Definitions and special rules (§1 - §9602)
|
|
Treasury Regulations are also authoritative: Sec. 7805(a) Authorization.--Except where such authority is expressly given by the title to any person other than an officer or employee of the Treasury Department, the Secretary shall prescribe all needful rules and regulations for the enforcement of this title. . . In some cases the Regulations are the principal authority because Congress relegated the rule making responsibility to the Treasury : Sec. 1502 Regulations.
|
|
Regulations Citations
Reg. § 1.274-2(f)(2)(iv)(b)(1). 1--means income tax.
Subdivisions below subparagraphs are not consistently referred to by the same names. Treasury Regulations are a part of the Code of Federal Regulations and are sometimes so cited: 26 CFR 1.274 etc. |
| Significance of first digit
1 Income tax
|
|
|
| Revenue Rulings are the IRS' answers to specific
questions. Permanent cites are to the Cumulative Bulletin. Temporary citations
are to the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Weekly IRB's
are bound semiannually and identified as the Cumulative Bulletin.
Rev. Rul. 2004-2, 2004-1 C. B. 28. This refers to the second Revenue Ruling issued in 2004. It can be found in the first volume of the Cumulative Bulletin published in 2004, beginning on page 28. Prior to 2000, only the last two digits of the year were used in references to the ruling number. For example, Rev. Rul. 89-1, 1989-1 C. B. 30. Temporary citations are to the Internal Revenue Bulletin: Rev. Rul. 2004-34, 2000-10 I.R.B. 12. Letter Rulings, sometimes called Private Letter Rulings, are not primary authority. In the citation Ltr. Rul. 200412345, 2004 refers to year the ruling was issued, 12 refers to the week and 345 refers to the 345th letter ruling during the week. Prior to 2000, only the last two digits of the year are included in the citation. For example, 9912345 refers to the 345 Letter Ruling issued during the 12 week of 1999. |
|
|
| Revenue Procedures are similar to Rulings,
but deal with procedural matters.
Rev. Proc. 2004-1, 2004-1 C. B. 40. |
Courts
|
|
|
|
| Tax Court and earlier Board of Tax Appeals | TC, TC Memo, TCM
BTA, BTA Memo |
19 judges. Only tax cases, and only if tax not paid. Has small claims division where there is no and usually no reporting of decision. No jury. IRS may Acq. or Nonacq. |
| District Courts | F. Supp., AFTR, and USTC | Each state has at least one. Pay tax first. Usually jury. Case is reported only if judge makes decision. |
| Court of Federal Claims, and earlier Claims Court and earlier Court of Claims | Fed. Cls., Ct. Cls., Cls. Ct. F., AFTR, USTC | 16 judges. Pay tax first. No jury. |
| Court of Appeals | F. AFTR, USTC | 13 circuits. We are in 11th. 3 judges hear each case. No jury, |
| Supreme | L.Ed., U.S., S.Ct., USTC, AFTR | 9 judges. Often hear cases involving conflict between circuits. Also consider other important issues. Court grant certiorari when it decides to hear case. |
|
Court cases are normally cited using the following format: Petitioner v. Respondent, volume reporter page, volume reporter page (court, year). Also include acq., non acq., and Cert. Indicate if on appeal. Usually cite only highest court. In case of individual taxpayers list both the first an last name. Where more than one individual is listed include on the name of the first person. Some tax reporters are cited utilizing a somewhat different format. Examples are shown below: |
| U. S. Tax Court
John W. Green, 78 T.C. 428 (1982). Walter H. Johnson, PH TC Memo ¶ 75,245, 34 TCM 1056, T. C. Memo 1975-245. Board of Tax Appeals citation is similar except use BTA instead of TC.
No CCH BTA memo.
U. S. District Court
U. S. Court of Federal Claims
U. S. Circuit Courts of Appeals
U. S. Supreme Court
|
|
|
| Tax professionals use standardized citations in their
work. The format does vary from one office to another, but
most professional offices prescribe a standardized format for use in the office. In this class, cite both CCH and RIA
(previously called PH) publications as they are commonly used by accountants. Do
not cite West.
Code
Regulations
Rulings and Procedures
Tax Court and Board of Tax Appeals
Other Tax Cases
|
|
|
|
| Research methodology is basically the same for both the scientific method and legal research. | |
|
|
|
Basic research approaches: Have general knowledge of subject?
![]() ![]() Know specific authority?
If yes, use finding lists. Use code section number, court case citations, revenue ruling and similar lists to find where in a service a specific authority is discussed. Other authority dealing with the same issue often is discussed at the same location. Try key words to search a database. Try different keywords. Again, common terms such as depreciation are not very useful. Often must use many combinations of words to find relevant authority. Try changing which databases you search and which resources you search within a database. Determining which precise words work may be one of the most challenging aspects of research. Try multiple services, special services, treatises, etc. After using likely resources:
Finish with a check on current developments, both in the current developments section of the service and the Citator. Be aware that many case, regulations and other authorities are not based on current law. |
![]() Not all research projects result in a clear cut answer. What do you do if the answer is not clear even after completing research? The confidence needed depends on the situation. |
| More likely than not authority
§ 6662(d)(2)(C)(i)(II) establishes this standard for tax shelters. Applies to taxpayers only. Disclosure does not enable taxpayer to avoid penalty. Substantial authority
Realistic possibility
Reasonable basis
Frivolous
|
|
Substance over form
Business purpose
Step transaction
Clear reflection of income
Constructive receipt
Reasonable amount
Assignment of income
Helvering v. Paul R. Horst, 24 AFTR 1058, 40-2 USTC ¶ 9787 (USSC, 1940)--coupon interest taxed to father who owned bonds rather than son who was given the coupons and cashed them. George B. Clifford, Jr. v. Helvering, 23 AFTR 1077, 40-1 USTC ¶ 9265 (USSC, 1940)-- income from a grantor trust is taxed to the grantor. Reallocation of income
|
![]() |
| According to § 6662(c ), negligence includes
any failure to make a reasonable attempt to comply with the provisions
of this title.
A taxpayer who disregards authority is negligent. The term disregard includes any careless, reckless, or intentional disregard of authority. Disregard also includes failure to seek out facts and/or authoritative answer. Under § 6664 (c )(1) neither the taxpayer or tax preparer is negligent if there is reasonable cause for the error and a good faith belief that the position is correct. If you do not have the required degree of confidence then must either forgo the favorable tax treatment or disclose the transaction. Disclosure, however, is not permitted if position is frivolous. Disclosure is made on Form 8275. |
|
|
| Specific and interfaced answer
Interest from a corporation is taxable. An estate tax return is due 9 months after death. Losses on sales of property to related persons are not deductible. Once the answer is determined the treatment is clear. Threshold assessment
Factored answer
Valuation answer
Conflicting answers
Little or no authority
|
|
|
| When evaluating authority, consider:
Rank--obviously, a higher court out ranks a lower court. Age--if old and unchallenged, it has stood the test of time. On the other hand, if there is a conflict, the new case may be more important because the court has gone against precedence to "change" the law. Jurisdiction --Will case go to that court? Is IRS bound?--The IRS supposedly follows its own primary authority, but may not follow a case. Closeness of facts--obviously, the closer the facts the more authoritative the source. Status--On appeal, Acq., Nonacq. A source still on appeal is less authoritative than one that is resolved. Number of decisions--majority does not necessarily rule, but still, I had rather be with the majority. Ascertain the factors and the standard:
|
|
|
| The below information is based on a 1972 article
in the Practical Accountant by H. G. Wong, "Ten Common
Pitfalls in Reading the Internal Revenue Code."
1. Determine the limitations and exceptions to a provision. Do not permit the language of the Code section to carry greater or lesser weight than was intended. Rules sometimes say they only apply to particular tax years or to particular taxpayers. Do not use the wrong rule at the wrong time. 2. Just because a section fails to mention an item does not necessarily mean that the item is excluded. For example, §61 states that gross income includes, but is not limited to, listed types of income. The Code does not always indicate whether a list is intended to be inclusive. 3. Read definitional clauses carefully. Often the meaning is far from what one might reasonably expect. For example, §403(i) defines employee to include employer for purposes of limitations on contributions to retirement plans. 4. Do not overlook small words such as "and" and "or". There is a world of difference between these two words. 5. Read the code section completely. Do not jump to conclusions prematurely. Special rules and exceptions are often at the end of the section. |
| 6. Watch out for cross-referenced and related
provisions, since many sections of the code are interrelated.
7. Congress is at times not careful when reconciling new Code provisions with existing sections. Conflicts among sections, therefore, do arise. Consider §163 which permits a limited deduction for interest incurred in connection with home equity loans and §265 which denies a deduction for interest incurred to purchase or carry tax exempt investments. Is interest deductible if the proceeds of a home equity loan are used to purchase tax exempt bonds? No, not according to the regulations under §163. |
| 8. Be alert for hidden definitions; terms
may be defined in the same section or in a separate section. For example,
there are several definitions of "related person" (§267 which denies
certain losses, etc., §318 which contains the definition of related
person used for most corporate transactions). Each is used at various times
and in various ways. Be sure to note which definition is being used when
a rule refers to related persons.
9. Some answers may not be found in the code. Therefore it is sometimes necessary to refer to regulations, cases, etc. For example, interest discussed above. 10. Take careful to note measuring words such as "less than 50%," "exceeds 35%," at least 80%," and more than 80%. Sometimes taxpayers want to push the limit. They ask, "How much must I sell, buy, give away, etc." When the law sets a limit, there is rarely any grace. It is not like the speed limit, where you might not get a ticket for going 56. Also, realize that because the taxpayer meets a threshold at a given time does not mean events outside the taxpayer's control. |
|
1. Regulations are assumed to be valid by the courts. The taxpayer must prove that they are wrong. 2. If a taxpayer takes a position contrary to the regulations and has no supporting authority, it is likely that the intentional disregard of rules and regulations penalty will be imposed. 3. Some regulations are stronger than others simply because of the fact that they are merely restating the code or because they code says that the secretary has the authority prescribe necessary regulations. Such regulations are in effect law. Other regulations may not be based on quite as solid of a foundation. 4. Many regulations are based on prior law. If the law has changed in the last few years, it is likely that at least some regulations are still based on the prior law. |
![]() |
| Memo to File
1. Facts 2. Issue 3. Discussion 4. Conclusion 5. Recommendation |
| Client letter
1. Introduction. 2. Summarize facts or refer to document containing facts, and include warning on facts. 3. Provide non technical discussion of authority. 4. State conclusion as to law, if law is clear. If not, explanation that law is not clear. 5. Make recommendation, and give warning if not a clear-cut situation. 6. Mention other issues that may need to be addressed. 7. If open facts and answer is unfavorable, suggest possible ways to improve results. 8. Comment on confidential nature of letter, if appropriate. 9. Closing.
|
| Ruling request
1. State that you are requesting a ruling. 2. Give facts: Names, dates, etc. including a detailed description of the specific transaction. 3. State clearly what outcome is being requested--e. g., "We request a ruling allowing taxpayer to deduct the expense in question." 4. Provide grounds for ruling requested--i. e., explain why you think the taxpayer deserves the deduction. This must be based on the relevant authority. Also, explain why contrary authority should not be followed. 5. Required statements. Includes a statement that the facts are accurate. Remember if the facts are not stated accurately and completely, the ruling may be invalid. 6. Attach copies of relevant documents. |
| Protest
1. Introduction. 2. Protest statement. 3. Support--may include either a different finding of facts or a different finding of law. 4. Request conference, if appropriate. 5. Required statement as to truth. |
For information on Florida tax research see http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~bandy/florida.htm
|
|
| Practitioner Services |
| Return preparation
Anyone can prepare tax returns. Only California has a registration requirement, and there is no education, examination, etc. required to be registered in California. Research
|
| Planning
There seem to be few, if any limitations on who can offer tax planning advice. Document preparation (e.g., wills, trust instruments, contracts, etc.) normally must be done by an attorney. Recommending specific investments probably requires registration with the Securities Exchange Commission. Representation in administrative proceedings
Representation in courts
|
|
Practice Procedures and Controls
![]() Client Selection and Relations
Insurance Coverage
Staff Utilization and Development
Organizational Form
|
|
If the IRS assesses additional taxes after a CPA has prepared a return, is the CPA liable for the taxes, interest, penalty, or representation costs? Obviously not, if the client mislead or otherwise causes the problem. Of course, there occasionally may be reason to pay some amounts even if there is no ethical or moral reason to do so in order to preserve a favorable client relationship. What is the liability, if the CPA somehow contributed to the error? Tax--Yes, if increase in tax because of error. Interest--Perhaps no, because taxpayer had use of money. Taxpayer penalty--Yes, if accountant caused the taxpayer to owe the penalty. Legal fees, etc.--If client incurs legal fees in defending a tax position, the accountant is liable only if the accountant's error caused the taxpayer to have to defend himself or herself. |
|
|
| These statements provide standards of service.
1. Tax return positions in cases of uncertainty
2. Answers to questions on returns
3. Certain procedural aspects of preparing returns
4. Use of estimates
5. Departure from a position previously concluded
6. Knowledge of error: Return preparation
7. Knowledge of error: Administrative proceedings
8. Form and content of advice to clients
9. Quality control (draft) Identifies five components to quality control. Advocate client's position with integrity and objectively. Manage personnel to assure quality of work. Establish and maintain policy regarding the acceptance and continuance of clients and engagements. Establish policies relating to the performance of professional services including evaluation of risk, review of work, meeting of deadlines, and file retention. Should monitor quality control plan and inspection of work.
|
|
|
| Confidential information--information
relating to clients is confidential. Some feel this means you cannot even
indicate whether someone is a client.
Privileged communication--can IRS obtain access to a CPA's records? Are they protected? In the past there has been practically no protection even in states that provide for accountant and client privileged communications (U.S. v Arthur Young & Co., 53 AFTR2d 84-866, 84 USTC ¶9305 (USSC, 1984)). Perhaps there was some very limited relief under authority of U.S. v. Coopers & Lybrand, 39 AFTR2d 77-809, 77-1 USTC ¶9216 (10th Cir., 1977). § 7525(a)(1) added in 1998 provides CPAs with the same privileged communications as attorneys with respect to "tax advice." The privilege may be asserted only in non criminal tax matters and is limited to tax advice. It does not extend directly to tax return preparation, tax fraud, or corporate tax shelters. The IRS has obtained the names of tax clients who participated in "tax shelters" since the privilege was established (USA v. BDO Seidman, 92 AFTR2d 2003-5443, 2003-2 USTC ¶50,582 (CA-7, 2003)). The privilege does not prevent other government agencies, such as the SEC, from obtaining such information. When the IRS requests information, accountants should discuss the matter with client, and advise client as to whether the requested information should be turned over. Information need not be turned over in absence of a subpoena, but delaying the process is forcing the IRS to resort to subpoenas is not necessarily effective. If you conclude that an IRS request is invalid, you should contact an attorney. Probably, would not turn over records to IRS without client approval without a court order. One area of conflict between CPAs and the IRS is when advice given constitutes a tax shelter. As noted above, the IRS has been successful in compelling firms to provide the names of clients who have utilized tax savings advice they have provided. §7609(a)(3)(E) indicates that records in the possession of an attorney are available to the IRS if they were obtained in connection with tax return or similar work. See U. S. v. J. Martin Lawless, 52 AFTR2d 83-5818, 83-1 USTC ¶9414 (7th Cir., 1983). So, don't let anyone suggest that the attorney-client privilege means that a taxpayer should use an attorney for tax return work. Right to an accountant--Miranda warning (Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 (USSC, 1966)) perhaps includes right to accountant. See U.S. v. Walter Tarlowski, 24 AFTR2d 69-5433, 69-2 USTC ¶9554 (EDNY, 1969). Discovery of errors--confidential relationship prohibits disclosure to IRS. Should contact client and advise client of steps needed to correct error. May not be able to continue as CPA, especially if dealing with IRS, because IRS often asks questions such as, is income underreported? Obviously cannot lie. May have to withdraw which is a signal to the IRS that there is a problem. Subsequent developments--generally no responsibility to inform client of new developments such as court cases, but may take that on as a specific assignment. Advice as a defense--client generally can rely on advice received as a defense against penalty, but not if rule is clear (e.g., U.S. v. Boyle, Executor, 55 AFTR2d 1535, 85-1 USTC ¶13602 (USSC, 1985). Due diligence--In John Brockhouse v. U.S., 55 AFTR2d 85-445, 84-2 USTC ¶10005 (7th Cir., 1984), an accountant who overlooked a client's interest income was penalized because he failed to ask about the income. Is tax work the practice of law?--New York County Lawyers' Association in re: Bercu 373 App.Div. 524, 78 NYS2d 209 (1949) says yes, but it is probably obsolete. Consider Sperry v. Florida, 373 US 379, 83 SCt 1322 (USSC, 1963). It is still possible that in some case, there could be a question. The fact that there is no reported losses by CPAs since 1948 and that Sperry was decided in the 1960's seems to indicate that it is not an everyday problem. In Grace v. Allen, 407 SW2d 321(CCA-Texas, 1966) advice was approved when it was a part of accounting service. In Sperry v. Florida the Supreme Court stated, "A State may not enforce licensing requirements. . . which impose upon the performance of activity sanctioned by federal license additional conditions not contemplated by Congress. No State Law can hinder or obstruct the free use of a license granted under the act of Congress." Audit and tax services--the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 restricts tax and other services that can be provided to publicly-traded audit clients. The Act does not restrict the services that can be provided to other clients including audit clients that are not publicly traded. Specifically, CPA firms may not recommend tax shelters with no business purpose other than tax avoidance to publicly-traded audit clients nor may they serve as counsel to such clients in court cases. Other tax services may be provided to publicly-traded audit clients with approval of the audit committee. Tax services that are permitted with approval include compliance, planning , representation before IRS and other tax agencies, and requesting rulings. CPA firms may provide appraisal and other valuation services to publicly-traded audit clients if the work is related to taxes (e.g., Sec. 482 inter-company pricing). |
|
Circular 230 is the IRS regulations regarding tax practitioners. Some additional rules include: Meet continuing education requirement (generally, 72 hours of tax education every three years). Prohibits contingent fees associated with original tax return. Requires practitioners to turn over information to IRS unless reasonably believe information is protected. Must advise taxpayer of consequences of tax return errors Inform IRS if disbarred or license is suspended. Exercise due diligence Not unreasonably delay prompt disposition of tax matters Fees must not be unconscionable Disclose conflict of interest and obtain consent or withdraw. I am not sure what this means, but could be an issue if giving tax advice and negotiating a contract in which you have an interest. Do not accept assistance from disbarred or suspended person. Advertise ethically. |
|
|
The IRS relies on two primary enforcement
methods: computer matching of information which is extensive and various types
of examination procedures which are selective.![]() |
|
Types of Enforcement Efforts Information Document Matching Program--IRS computers match income and deductions shown on returns with information reported on W-2's, 1099, and similar forms. Mathematical/Clerical Error Program--Mathematical and clerical errors are handled by the Service center. Unallowables Program--Obvious errors such as deducting the federal income tax or deducting the wrong amount for the standard deduction are also handled by the Service center. Correspondence audit--taxpayer is asked to provide copies of receipts, canceled checks, and other documents in connection with specific items such as charitable contributions or medical expenses. Office examination--taxpayer takes records to IRS office and a specific items such as business automobile expense and rental income are examined. Usually a 1040 return, without Schedule C income. Field examination--usually a business return, Schedule C, 1065 or 1120. More intensive, but usually not exhaustive. Similar to but usually less extensive than a financial accounting audit. The IRS concentrates on items that are likely to result in an addition to taxes--e. g., entertainment, travel, business automobile, etc. The field examination is used when the documentation to be examined is so extensive that it is impractical for the taxpayer to bring the information to the IRS. Research audit--National Research Program (NRP) which replaces the Taxpayer Compliance Measurement Program (TCMP) is used to determine what items should be audited. The focus of the examination is on whether the taxpayer filed the appropriate returns, paid the tax, and reported the correct items. Criminal investigation--conducted by Special Agents. Often leads to criminal charges being brought against the taxpayer. Result of audits: revenue agent report (RAR):
Adjustment (addition to tax)--reviewed, and either taxpayer must pay or appeal (80%) Refund--in most cases the result of information from taxpayer rather that IRS determination (5%). Notification and appeal:
|
|
|
| Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representation
Usually prepared by practitioner and signed by taxpayer. Gives holder authority to represent taxpayer before the IRS. Required unless taxpayer is present. Form 2848 is used. Tax Information Authorizations
General or Durable Power of Attorney
Revenue Agent's Report
Waiver Agreements (§ 6213)
Closing Agreement (§ 7121)
Collateral Agreement
Notice of Deficiency or 90 Day Letter (§
6212)
Compromise Agreement (§ 7122)
Application for Taxpayer Assistance Order
Extensions to File (§
6081)
Extensions to Pay Tax Installment Agreement Request
(§ 6161)
Agreements to Extend Time to Assess Taxes or Bring
Suit
Prompt Assessment
|
|
|
| Assessment
§6501(a)*--Generally: 3 years §6501(e)--Omit gross receipts of equal to 25% or more of reported gross income: 6 years §6511(d)(1)*--Bad debts and worthless securities: 7 years §6501 (c )--False or fraudulent return: none * Also applies to changes initiated by the taxpayer Collection
Extensions of assessment period
Mitigation rules
|
Taxpayer Penalties

|
|
|
|
|
|
Negligence. | 20% of tax underpayment due to negligence. |
|
|
Substantial underpayment (underpayment more than 10% of tax shown on return or $5,000 ($10,000 in case of corporation)). | 20% of underpayment due to understatement. |
|
|
Overstatement of charitable contributions or pension liability, and understatement of estate or gift tax value, or §482 misstatement. | Overstatements: 20% of overstatement if reported amount is 200% or more of correct amount, and 40% of understatement if reported amount is 400% or more of correct amount. Understatements: 20% of understatement if reported amount is 50% or less of correct amount, and 40% of understatement if reported amount is 25% or less of correct amount. |
|
|
Failure to pay tax due to fraud. | 75% of tax underpayment due to fraud plus 50% of interest. |
|
|
Failure to file. | 5% of balance due per month (up to 25%), minimum of $100 or 100% of tax if return is more than 60 days late). |
|
|
Penalty for failure to make required payments. Applies only after due date for return including extensions. | ½% per month times balance due, not to exceed 25%. Paid on top of §6601 interest. |
|
|
Interest on taxes paid with extensions. | Interest charged at a rate that is set by IRS every 6 months. |
|
|
Failure to make estimated payments (individuals). | Rate that is set every 6 months. |
|
|
Failure to make estimated payments (corporations). | Rate that is set every 6 months. |
|
|
Bad check. | 2% of check, minimum $15. |
|
|
Failure to deposit payroll taxes, etc. | 2 - 15% of balance due depending on length of delay. |
|
|
Failure to file Form 1099, W-2, etc. | $50 per return, maximum $250,000. |
|
|
Frivolous return penalty (tax protesters, etc.). | $500. |
|
|
Claiming false withholding allowance. | $500. |
|
|
Failure to collect or remit withholding. | 100% of the amount (applies to responsible person). |
|
|
Criminal fraud. | Up to 5 years and $500,000. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negligence | $250 |
|
|
Willful understatement of tax | $1,000 |
|
|
Failure to furnish copy of return to taxpayer, to sign return, to furnish ID number, to retain either a copy or a list of returns prepared, or to retain a list of preparers employed. | $50 per failure, up to a $25,000 maximum for each type of failure |
|
|
Endorsing or negotiating a tax refund check | $500 |
|
|
Civil aid in understatement | $1,000 ($10,000 for corporation) |
|
|
Fraudulent aid in understatement | $100,000 ($500,000 for corporation) and 3 years imprisonment |
|
|
Willful disclosure of fraudulent document to IRS | $10,000 ($50,000 for corporation) and 1 year imprisonment |
|
|
Unauthorized disclosure of taxpayer information | $1,000 fine and 1 year imprisonment |
|
|
Unauthorized disclosure of taxpayer information | Damages equal to the greater of $1,000 or litigation costs plus punitive damages |